tulip: have leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.70
, bulb
Weight: 0.69
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, motif
Weight: 0.50
Siblings peony
Weight: 0.38
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.37
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have leaves 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tulip, have leaves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(plant, have leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(plant, have leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, have leaves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tulip, have leaves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hydrangea, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, have leaves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tulip, have leaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tulip, have leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, have leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hydrangea, have leaves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, have leaves)