tuna: be expensive in japan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.59
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.38
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37
, marlin
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in japan 1.00
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(staple, is expensive)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(staple, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(halibut, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(halibut, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(halibut, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mackerel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mackerel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(tuna, be expensive in japan)

Similarity expansion

0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tuna, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tuna, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tuna, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(halibut, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mackerel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tuna, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)