tundra: be bad on gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on gas 1.00
get bad gas mileage 0.86
get gas mileage 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(tundra, be bad on gas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tundra, get bad gas mileage)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tundra, get bad gas mileage)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tundra, get bad gas mileage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tundra, get gas mileage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(tundra, get gas mileage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tundra, get gas mileage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tundra, get bad gas mileage)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tundra, get gas mileage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be bad on gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tundra, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tundra, be bad on gas)