tundra: be cheaper than tacoma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than tacoma 1.00
be cheaper than tacomas 0.94
is expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tundra, be cheaper than tacomas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be cheaper than tacomas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tundra, be cheaper than tacomas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tundra, be cheaper than tacomas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tundra, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tundra, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tundra, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tundra, be cheaper than tacoma)