tundra: be similar to desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar to desert 1.00
is desert 0.93
be considered desert 0.90
be similar 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vehicle, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tundra, be similar to desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(ecosystem, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tundra, be similar to desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be similar)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be similar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be similar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be similar)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be similar)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vehicle, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(ecosystem, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(grassland, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(grassland, be similar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(wetland, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(tundra, be similar to desert)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tundra, is desert)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tundra, is desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tundra, is desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tundra, be considered desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(tundra, be considered desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be considered desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tundra, be considered desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tundra, be similar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tundra, be similar)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tundra, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tundra, be similar to desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be similar)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(vehicle, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grassland, be similar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wetland, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be similar)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tundra, be similar to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(vehicle, be similar)