tundra: has state environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state environment 1.00
has state climate 0.88
is fragile environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(grassland, has state climate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(grassland, has state climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(grassland, has state climate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tundra, has state environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tundra, has state climate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tundra, has state climate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tundra, has state climate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tundra, has state climate)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tundra, is fragile environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tundra, is fragile environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is fragile environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(tundra, is fragile environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tundra, has state environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tundra, has state environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tundra, has state environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(grassland, has state climate)