tunnel: be built underwater

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.67
, route
Weight: 0.64
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings underground
Weight: 0.55
, bridge
Weight: 0.35
, rail
Weight: 0.34
, stadium
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be underwater built 1.00
be built underwater 1.00
be constructed underwater 0.96
get into underwater ground 0.86
be built in ocean 0.85
be built in water 0.83
be built over water 0.81
be over water built 0.81
be built 0.81
is built 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(facility, is built)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(structure, is built)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(facility, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(facility, is built)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(structure, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bridge, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stadium, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built over water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(facility, is built)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(structure, is built)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built in water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(bridge, be built over water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built over water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bridge, be built)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bridge, is built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bridge, is built)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(stadium, is built)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(stadium, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built underwater)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be underwater built)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tunnel, be underwater built)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be underwater built)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tunnel, be underwater built)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built in ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built in ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built in ocean)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tunnel, is built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built in ocean)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tunnel, is built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, is built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tunnel, is built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(facility, is built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bridge, be built in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bridge, be built over water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bridge, be built)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bridge, is built)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(stadium, is built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(structure, is built)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tunnel, be built underwater)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(facility, is built)