turf: be better than grass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grass
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, landscaping
Weight: 0.50
, place
Weight: 0.47
Siblings artificial turf
Weight: 0.37
, asphalt
Weight: 0.33
, bermuda
Weight: 0.32
, ground
Weight: 0.32
, hardwood
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than grass 1.00
be hotter than grass 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, be better than grass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(artificial turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(artificial turf, be better than grass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(turf, be better than grass)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, be hotter than grass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(turf, be hotter than grass)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(turf, be hotter than grass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(turf, be hotter than grass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(turf, be better than grass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(turf, be better than grass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(turf, be better than grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(artificial turf, be better than grass)