turnover: be important in lakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, indicator
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, fumble
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.53
Siblings margin
Weight: 0.32
, interception
Weight: 0.32
, attrition
Weight: 0.31
, score
Weight: 0.31
, growth
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in lakes 1.00
living is in freshwater 0.80
occur in river 0.78
be for aquatic ecosystems 0.78
be in water 0.78
many rivers in asia 0.75
be important in hydrological system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(problem, many rivers in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(turnover, be important in lakes)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(problem, living is in freshwater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(turnover, be important in lakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(problem, living is in freshwater)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(problem, many rivers in asia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(problem, living is in freshwater)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, many rivers in asia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interception, be important in hydrological system)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attrition, occur in river)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(problem, many rivers in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(problem, living is in freshwater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attrition, occur in river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(attrition, occur in river)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(interception, be important in hydrological system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(interception, be important in hydrological system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(turnover, be important in lakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(turnover, be important in lakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(problem, living is in freshwater)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(problem, many rivers in asia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(interception, be important in hydrological system)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(attrition, occur in river)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(problem, living is in freshwater)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(turnover, be important in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(problem, many rivers in asia)