tusk: is good now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents song
Weight: 0.51
, animal
Weight: 0.48
, body part
Weight: 0.48
, trophy
Weight: 0.44
, ivory
Weight: 0.43
Siblings skull
Weight: 0.32
, mastodon
Weight: 0.32
, boa constrictor
Weight: 0.32
, tree frog
Weight: 0.32
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good now 1.00
has quality good 0.83
is great 0.83
has quality bad 0.79
is good carry 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tusk, is good now)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(trophy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tusk, is good now)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(trophy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(trophy, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mastodon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tusk, is good now)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(trophy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tusk, is good now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mastodon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mastodon, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tusk, is good now)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tusk, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tusk, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good carry)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tusk, is good carry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tusk, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tusk, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tusk, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tusk, is good carry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(tusk, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tusk, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tusk, is good carry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tusk, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tusk, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tusk, is great)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tusk, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tusk, is good now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(trophy, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mastodon, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(trophy, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tusk, is good now)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)