tweet: be in time order

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.56
, conversation
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.55
Siblings twitter
Weight: 0.35
, blog
Weight: 0.34
, message
Weight: 0.33
, meme
Weight: 0.33
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in time order 1.00
be out of order 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be out of order)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(twitter, be out of order)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(twitter, be out of order)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tweet, be in time order)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tweet, be out of order)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tweet, be out of order)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tweet, be out of order)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tweet, be out of order)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tweet, be in time order)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tweet, be in time order)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tweet, be in time order)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(twitter, be out of order)