twitter: be banned in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.72
, web page
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
, website
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings blog
Weight: 0.37
, web
Weight: 0.37
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.36
, web browser
Weight: 0.35
, google
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in china 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(google, be banned in china)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, be banned in china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(wikipedia, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, be banned in china)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(google, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(google, be banned in china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(twitter, be banned in china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be banned in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(twitter, be banned in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wikipedia, be banned in china)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(google, be banned in china)