two people: be with same name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with same name 1.00
use same time 0.81
talking at exact same time 0.79
have same exact dream 0.79
have same phone number 0.78
be on same team in multiplyer 0.77
be on same team 0.77
talking at same time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(two people, be with same name)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(two people, use same time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(two people, talking at exact same time)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(two people, have same exact dream)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(two people, have same phone number)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(two people, use same time)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(two people, be on same team in multiplyer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(two people, be on same team)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(two people, have same phone number)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(two people, use same time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(two people, have same phone number)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(two people, have same phone number)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(two people, have same exact dream)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(two people, talking at exact same time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(two people, be on same team in multiplyer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(two people, be on same team)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(two people, have same exact dream)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(two people, talking at exact same time)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(two people, be on same team in multiplyer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(two people, talking at exact same time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(two people, be on same team)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(two people, have same exact dream)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(two people, use same time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(two people, be on same team in multiplyer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(two people, be on same team)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(two people, be with same name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(two people, be with same name)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(two people, be with same name)