type: be hard than use computer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.56
Siblings element
Weight: 0.66
, lymphoma
Weight: 0.63
, case
Weight: 0.63
, plastic
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard than use computer 1.00
be used to use computer 0.89
requires turn on computer 0.84
be motivated by you enter information on computer 0.81
be hard 0.81
requires have typewriter or computer 0.81
be used to write computer program 0.81
be motivated by it be fast than write 0.80
requires use keyboard or typwwriter 0.78
be used to work good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attribute, be used to work good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(type, be hard than use computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attribute, be used to work good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be used to work good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attribute, be used to work good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be hard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(plastic, be hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(type, be hard than use computer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(type, be motivated by you enter information on computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(type, be used to write computer program)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(type, be used to use computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(type, be used to use computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(type, requires turn on computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(type, requires turn on computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(type, be used to use computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(type, requires turn on computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(type, requires have typewriter or computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(type, requires have typewriter or computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(type, requires use keyboard or typwwriter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(type, be used to write computer program)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(type, be motivated by you enter information on computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(type, be used to use computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(type, be motivated by you enter information on computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(type, requires have typewriter or computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(type, be used to write computer program)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(type, requires use keyboard or typwwriter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(type, requires turn on computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(type, requires use keyboard or typwwriter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(type, requires have typewriter or computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(type, requires use keyboard or typwwriter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(type, be used to write computer program)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(type, be motivated by you enter information on computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(type, be hard than use computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(attribute, be used to work good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(plastic, be hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(attribute, be used to work good)