type: differ from type 2 gaucher disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, parameter
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.61
Siblings element
Weight: 0.66
, lymphoma
Weight: 0.63
, case
Weight: 0.63
, plastic
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from type 2 gaucher disease 1.00
daibetes differ from type 2 diabetes 0.93
be different 2 diabetes 0.81
be 2 diabetes typically treated 0.80
is 2 diabetes common 0.79
is 1 diabetes considered 0.79
was 2 diabetes referred as onset diabetes 0.79
was 2 diabetes referred to as onset diabetes 0.79
was 2 diabetes referred to as adult onset diabetes 0.79
was 2 diabetes referred as adult onset diabetes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(type, daibetes differ from type 2 diabetes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(type, daibetes differ from type 2 diabetes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(type, daibetes differ from type 2 diabetes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(type, be different 2 diabetes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(type, be 2 diabetes typically treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(type, is 1 diabetes considered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(type, was 2 diabetes referred to as adult onset diabetes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(type, be different 2 diabetes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(type, be different 2 diabetes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(type, be 2 diabetes typically treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(type, be 2 diabetes typically treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(type, is 1 diabetes considered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(type, is 1 diabetes considered)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(type, was 2 diabetes referred to as adult onset diabetes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(type, was 2 diabetes referred to as adult onset diabetes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(type, daibetes differ from type 2 diabetes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(type, be different 2 diabetes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(type, be 2 diabetes typically treated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(type, is 1 diabetes considered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(type, was 2 diabetes referred to as adult onset diabetes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(type, differ from type 2 gaucher disease)