uber: be expensive in paris

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in paris 1.00
be expensive in rome 0.84
be expensive in japan 0.78
is london 0.77
work in london 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(uber, be expensive in paris)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(uber, be expensive in rome)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(uber, be expensive in rome)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(uber, be expensive in rome)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(uber, be expensive in japan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uber, be expensive in rome)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(uber, be expensive in japan)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(uber, be expensive in japan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(uber, be expensive in japan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(uber, work in london)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, work in london)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(uber, work in london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(uber, work in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(uber, be expensive in paris)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(uber, be expensive in paris)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(uber, be expensive in paris)