ulna: has state dislocation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.47
, wrist
Weight: 0.35
Siblings pelvis
Weight: 0.33
, clavicle
Weight: 0.32
, humerus
Weight: 0.32
, scapula
Weight: 0.32
, rib cage
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state dislocation 1.00
has state pain 0.76
be at risk for fracture 0.76
dislocated 0.75
be at risk to fracture 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(clavicle, be at risk for fracture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(clavicle, be at risk to fracture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, has state pain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvis, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pelvis, has state pain)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(clavicle, be at risk to fracture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(clavicle, be at risk to fracture)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(clavicle, be at risk for fracture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(clavicle, be at risk for fracture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ulna, has state dislocation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ulna, has state dislocation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pelvis, has state pain)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(clavicle, be at risk for fracture)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ulna, has state dislocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(clavicle, be at risk to fracture)