umbilical cord: be cut in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.65
, stem cell
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
, embryo
Weight: 0.56
Siblings vocal cord
Weight: 0.36
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.35
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.35
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.34
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cut in nature 1.00
is cut 0.86
have cut 0.85
has state cut 0.82
is cut away 0.80
have cut away 0.79
have cut right away 0.78
is cut right away 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, is cut)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, is cut)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, has state cut)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, have cut right away)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, has state cut)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, is cut)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, is cut right away)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, is cut right away)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, have cut right away)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, has state cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, have cut)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, have cut away)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, is cut right away)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, have cut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, have cut)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, have cut right away)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, has state cut)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, is cut away)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, have cut)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, is cut right away)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, is cut away)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, is cut away)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, have cut right away)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, is cut away)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, is cut)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, have cut away)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(umbilical cord, have cut away)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(umbilical cord, have cut away)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(umbilical cord, be cut in nature)