uncle: be larry dipshit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.67
, brother
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings cousin
Weight: 0.66
, dad
Weight: 0.65
, father
Weight: 0.40
, nephew
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be larry dipshit 1.00
is sam joseph ducreaux 0.82
is sam uncle sam 0.77
is sam 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(uncle, be larry dipshit)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(uncle, is sam uncle sam)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(uncle, is sam)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(uncle, is sam)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(uncle, is sam uncle sam)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(uncle, is sam)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(uncle, is sam uncle sam)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is sam)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is sam uncle sam)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(uncle, be larry dipshit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(uncle, be larry dipshit)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uncle, be larry dipshit)