uncle: silas visit jim

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.67
, brother
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings cousin
Weight: 0.66
, dad
Weight: 0.65
, father
Weight: 0.40
, nephew
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
silas visit jim 1.00
silas visit jim in shed 0.93
is sam joseph ducreaux 0.79
is sam uncle sam 0.77
is sam 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(uncle, silas visit jim)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(uncle, silas visit jim in shed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(uncle, is sam uncle sam)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(uncle, is sam)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(uncle, silas visit jim in shed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(uncle, is sam)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(uncle, is sam uncle sam)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uncle, silas visit jim in shed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim in shed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is sam joseph ducreaux)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(uncle, is sam)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(uncle, is sam uncle sam)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is sam)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is sam uncle sam)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(uncle, silas visit jim)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(uncle, silas visit jim)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(uncle, silas visit jim)