uncle: was cabin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.67
, brother
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings cousin
Weight: 0.66
, dad
Weight: 0.65
, father
Weight: 0.40
, nephew
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
was cabin 1.00
was cabin important 0.98
was cabin important in 1852 0.98
was tom cabin 0.91
was tom cabin important 0.91
was tom cabin important in 1852 0.91
is tom 's cabin significance 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(uncle, was cabin)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(uncle, was cabin important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uncle, was cabin important in 1852)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(uncle, was tom cabin)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(uncle, was tom cabin important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uncle, was tom cabin important in 1852)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(uncle, is tom 's cabin significance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(uncle, was cabin important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(uncle, was tom cabin important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(uncle, was tom cabin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(uncle, is tom 's cabin significance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uncle, was cabin important in 1852)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(uncle, was tom cabin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(uncle, was tom cabin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(uncle, was cabin important in 1852)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(uncle, was tom cabin important in 1852)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(uncle, was tom cabin important in 1852)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uncle, was cabin important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(uncle, is tom 's cabin significance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(uncle, was cabin important in 1852)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(uncle, was tom cabin important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(uncle, was cabin important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(uncle, was tom cabin important in 1852)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(uncle, was tom cabin important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(uncle, is tom 's cabin significance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(uncle, was cabin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uncle, was cabin)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(uncle, was cabin)