underwear: has physical part layer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.62
, bra
Weight: 0.54
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, lingerie
Weight: 0.36
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part layer 1.00
have extra layer 0.88
have two layers 0.84
has physical part holes 0.79
has physical part hole 0.78
has physical part feature 0.78
has physical part region 0.77
has physical part pads 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(basque, has physical part region)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bra, has physical part pads)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(basque, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(basque, has physical part region)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bra, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bra, has physical part pads)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part layer)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(underwear, have two layers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(underwear, have two layers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(underwear, have extra layer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(underwear, have two layers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have extra layer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(underwear, have extra layer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(underwear, have extra layer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have two layers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part layer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(basque, has physical part region)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part layer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bra, has physical part pads)