uniform: be important in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rule
Weight: 0.60
, necessity
Weight: 0.60
, officer
Weight: 0.59
, outfit
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
Siblings jersey
Weight: 0.54
, sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, dress
Weight: 0.33
, police officer
Weight: 0.33
, helmet
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in workplace 1.00
be helpful for employees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dress, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dress, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(dress, be important in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(uniform, be important in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(uniform, be helpful for employees)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(uniform, be helpful for employees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(uniform, be helpful for employees)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(uniform, be helpful for employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uniform, be important in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uniform, be important in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uniform, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dress, be important in workplace)