uniform: have backwards flags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rule
Weight: 0.60
, necessity
Weight: 0.60
, officer
Weight: 0.59
, outfit
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
Siblings jersey
Weight: 0.54
, sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, dress
Weight: 0.33
, police officer
Weight: 0.33
, helmet
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have backwards flags 1.00
have backwards flag 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have backwards flags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(police officer, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(police officer, have backwards flags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(uniform, have backwards flags)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(uniform, have backwards flag)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(uniform, have backwards flag)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(uniform, have backwards flag)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uniform, have backwards flag)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(uniform, have backwards flags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uniform, have backwards flags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(uniform, have backwards flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(police officer, have backwards flags)