union: be bad for companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for companies 1.00
be bad for businesses 0.89
be bad for economy 0.79
be negative for business owners 0.77
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(labor, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(labor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(labor, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(union, be bad for companies)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for businesses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(union, be negative for business owners)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(union, be bad for businesses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(union, be negative for business owners)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(union, be bad for businesses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(union, be bad for businesses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(union, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(union, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(union, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(union, be negative for business owners)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(union, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(union, be negative for business owners)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(union, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(union, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(union, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(union, be bad for companies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(labor, has quality bad)