union: be used to maintain worker standard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33
, employer
Weight: 0.32
, golf club
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to maintain worker standard 1.00
pay worker 0.85
be used to protect worker right 0.84
be used to organize worker 0.82
require employee to work 0.79
pay employee with check 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(employer, pay worker)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(employer, pay employee with check)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(employer, require employee to work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(employer, pay worker)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(employer, pay worker)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(employer, pay employee with check)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(employer, pay employee with check)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(employer, require employee to work)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employer, require employee to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(union, be used to maintain worker standard)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(union, be used to organize worker)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(union, be used to protect worker right)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(union, be used to organize worker)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(union, be used to protect worker right)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(union, be used to protect worker right)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to organize worker)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to protect worker right)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(union, be used to organize worker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(union, be used to maintain worker standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(employer, pay worker)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(employer, require employee to work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(union, be used to maintain worker standard)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(employer, pay employee with check)