unit: have two time units

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two time units 1.00
target other units 0.84
be called unit 0.79
be called imperial units 0.77
be wrote in units 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(unit, have two time units)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(unit, be called unit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(unit, be called unit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(unit, be called unit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unit, target other units)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(unit, be called imperial units)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(unit, target other units)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(unit, target other units)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(unit, target other units)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(unit, be called imperial units)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(unit, be called unit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(unit, be called imperial units)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(unit, be called imperial units)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(unit, have two time units)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, have two time units) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(unit, have two time units)