unit: standard system of is system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
standard system of is system 1.00
standard system of is coherent system 0.90
has quality standard 0.84
need security systems 0.76
is information system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(facility, need security systems)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(unit, standard system of is system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(facility, need security systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(facility, need security systems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(facility, need security systems)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(unit, standard system of is system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(unit, standard system of is system)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(unit, standard system of is coherent system)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(unit, has quality standard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(unit, standard system of is coherent system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(unit, standard system of is coherent system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(unit, has quality standard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(unit, standard system of is coherent system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(unit, standard system of is system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(unit, standard system of is system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(facility, need security systems)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(unit, standard system of is system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(facility, need security systems)