united states: be in debt with china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents united nations
Weight: 0.82
, united kingdom
Weight: 0.73
, soviet union
Weight: 0.70
, central america
Weight: 0.70
Siblings united arab emirates
Weight: 0.77
, state
Weight: 0.68
, czech republic
Weight: 0.66
, national parks
Weight: 0.63
, iran
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in debt with china 1.00
be in debt 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(united kingdom, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(united states, be in debt with china)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(united kingdom, be in debt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(united kingdom, be in debt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(united kingdom, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(united states, be in debt with china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(united states, be in debt with china)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(united states, be in debt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(united states, be in debt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(united states, be in debt)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in debt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in debt with china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(united states, be in debt with china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(united kingdom, be in debt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(united states, be in debt with china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(united kingdom, be in debt)