united states: have strong reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents united nations
Weight: 0.82
, united kingdom
Weight: 0.73
, soviet union
Weight: 0.70
, central america
Weight: 0.70
Siblings united arab emirates
Weight: 0.77
, state
Weight: 0.68
, czech republic
Weight: 0.66
, national parks
Weight: 0.63
, iran
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have strong reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.94
have strong reputation for creditworthiness 0.85
have reputation for creditworthiness 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(united states, have strong reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(united states, have reputation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(united states, have reputation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(united states, have strong reputation for creditworthiness)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(united states, have reputation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(united states, have strong reputation for creditworthiness)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(united states, have reputation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(united states, have reputation for creditworthiness)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(united states, have strong reputation for creditworthiness)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(united states, have reputation for creditworthiness)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(united states, have strong reputation for creditworthiness)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(united states, have reputation for creditworthiness)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(united states, have reputation for creditworthiness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(united states, have strong reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(united states, have strong reputation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(united states, have strong reputation)