university: honor researcher with award

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.68
, campus
Weight: 0.67
, community
Weight: 0.67
, educational system
Weight: 0.65
Siblings graduate student
Weight: 0.69
, cambridge
Weight: 0.68
, college student
Weight: 0.66
, oxford
Weight: 0.63
, temple
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
honor researcher with award 1.00
honor alumnus with award 0.84
honor good student 0.78
honor student with degree 0.76
be at professor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(college, honor student with degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(university, honor researcher with award)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(college, honor alumnus with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(university, honor researcher with award)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(college, honor alumnus with award)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(college, honor student with degree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, honor alumnus with award)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(college, honor student with degree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(college, honor alumnus with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(university, honor researcher with award)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(college, honor student with degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(university, honor researcher with award)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(university, honor researcher with award)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(university, honor good student)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(university, honor good student)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(university, be at professor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(university, be at professor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(university, be at professor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(university, honor good student)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(university, be at professor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(university, honor good student)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(university, honor researcher with award)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(college, honor student with degree)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(college, honor alumnus with award)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(college, honor alumnus with award)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(university, honor researcher with award) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(college, honor student with degree)