uranium: is renewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.66
, substance
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tungsten
Weight: 0.37
, iron ore
Weight: 0.37
, molybdenum
Weight: 0.37
, manganese
Weight: 0.37
, ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is renewable 1.00
is non renewable 0.96
is renewable resource 0.94
is non renewable resource 0.92
is 238 nonrenewable resource 0.77
is nonrenewable resource 0.77
be considered nonrenewable resource 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is non renewable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ore, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(iron ore, is non renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is non renewable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is renewable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(uranium, is renewable)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(uranium, is nonrenewable resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(uranium, is nonrenewable resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(uranium, is nonrenewable resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is nonrenewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(uranium, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(iron ore, is non renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iron ore, is renewable)