urinalysis: has physical part tool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents test
Weight: 0.65
, testing
Weight: 0.43
, search
Weight: 0.43
, evaluation
Weight: 0.43
, method
Weight: 0.41
Siblings stress test
Weight: 0.35
, amniocentesis
Weight: 0.32
, echocardiogram
Weight: 0.31
, electrocardiogram
Weight: 0.31
, angiogram
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tool 1.00
be important tool in physical 0.97
has physical part tools 0.93
be important tool in routine physical 0.90
is useful tool 0.89
be such important tool for doctors 0.86
is important tools 0.86
has physical part process 0.84
is useful diagnostic tool 0.83
is diagnostic tool 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(testing, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(testing, has physical part process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(testing, has physical part process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, is important tools)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has physical part tools)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(testing, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has physical part tools)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has physical part tools)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, is important tools)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, is important tools)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, be important tool in physical)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, be important tool in routine physical)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is useful tool)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, be such important tool for doctors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is useful diagnostic tool)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is diagnostic tool)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(urinalysis, is useful tool)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(urinalysis, be important tool in physical)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(urinalysis, is useful tool)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, is useful tool)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(urinalysis, is diagnostic tool)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(urinalysis, be important tool in routine physical)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, is diagnostic tool)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(urinalysis, is useful diagnostic tool)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(urinalysis, be such important tool for doctors)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(urinalysis, is diagnostic tool)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, be important tool in physical)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, is useful diagnostic tool)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, be important tool in routine physical)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, be such important tool for doctors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(urinalysis, is useful diagnostic tool)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(urinalysis, be important tool in physical)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(urinalysis, be important tool in routine physical)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(urinalysis, be such important tool for doctors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(testing, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has physical part tools)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, is important tools)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(urinalysis, has physical part tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(testing, has physical part process)