urinalysis: is questioned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents test
Weight: 0.65
, testing
Weight: 0.43
, search
Weight: 0.43
, evaluation
Weight: 0.43
, method
Weight: 0.41
Siblings stress test
Weight: 0.35
, amniocentesis
Weight: 0.32
, echocardiogram
Weight: 0.31
, electrocardiogram
Weight: 0.31
, angiogram
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is questioned 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, is questioned)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(stress test, is questioned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(stress test, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(stress test, is questioned)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, is questioned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(urinalysis, is questioned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is questioned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(urinalysis, is questioned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(stress test, is questioned)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, is questioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, is questioned)