:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(stomach, burn)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(stomach, burns)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(stomach, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(stomach, burn)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(urinate, burn)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(urinate, burn)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(stomach, burn)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(urinate, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(stomach, burns)