user: is design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consumer
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.67
, computer user
Weight: 0.67
, dealer
Weight: 0.60
, cyclist
Weight: 0.60
, partner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is design 1.00
is design important 0.96
understand design 0.88
is design important in media 0.87
is centered design 0.84
is centered design important 0.83
is centered design important in media 0.80
is design important in interactive media 0.80
is centered design important in interactive media 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(user, is design)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(user, is design important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(user, is design important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(user, is design important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(user, is centered design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(user, is centered design important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(user, is centered design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(user, is centered design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(user, is centered design important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(user, is design important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(user, is centered design important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(user, is centered design)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(user, is centered design important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(user, is design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(user, is design)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(user, is design)