:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michigan, was found)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(utah, was made)
Similarity expansion
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(utah, was found)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(utah, was found)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(utah, was found)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(utah, was found)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(utah, was made)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(utah, was made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(michigan, was found)