utensil: be made of silver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of silver 1.00
be made of copper 0.82
made up of copper 0.80
be made of metal 0.80
made of metal 0.79
be made from metals 0.79
be made of metals 0.78
be made up of metal 0.77
be made up of metals 0.77
be made of aluminum 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of silver)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of copper)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(utensil, be made from metals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, made up of copper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(utensil, made of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made from metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(utensil, be made from metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of copper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of copper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(utensil, made up of copper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(utensil, made up of copper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of copper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made up of copper)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made from metals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of silver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)