utility: be such important to feature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.61
, water
Weight: 0.59
Siblings power line
Weight: 0.70
, electricity
Weight: 0.70
, power plant
Weight: 0.68
, gas
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such important to feature 1.00
be such important feature of marketing 0.91
be such important to feature of marketing 0.91
be important feature of marketing 0.87
be such as water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(utility, be such important to feature)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(utility, be such important to feature of marketing)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(utility, be such important feature of marketing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utility, be such important feature of marketing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utility, be such important to feature of marketing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(utility, be important feature of marketing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(utility, be such important feature of marketing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(utility, be such important to feature of marketing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utility, be important feature of marketing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(utility, be important feature of marketing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(utility, be such as water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(utility, be such as water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(utility, be such as water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(utility, be such important to feature of marketing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(utility, be such important feature of marketing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(utility, be important feature of marketing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(utility, be such as water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utility, be such important to feature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(utility, be such important to feature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utility, be such important to feature)