utility: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.61
, water
Weight: 0.59
Siblings power line
Weight: 0.70
, electricity
Weight: 0.70
, power plant
Weight: 0.68
, gas
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive in america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(electricity, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(power plant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(power plant, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(electricity, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(electricity, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(utility, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(utility, be expensive in america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(utility, be expensive in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(utility, be expensive in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utility, be expensive in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(utility, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(utility, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electricity, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(utility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(power plant, is expensive)