vacation: be define by lack of work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trip
Weight: 0.64
, time travel
Weight: 0.34
, sunny day
Weight: 0.33
, summer day
Weight: 0.33
, travel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be define by lack of work 1.00
be define 0.85
causes get work do 0.78
causes work do 0.78
be used to get to work 0.77
be measure but not see 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(work, causes get work do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(time, be define) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(time, be measure but not see) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(time, be measure but not see)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(time, be define)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(work, causes get work do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(time, be define)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(work, causes get work do)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(time, be measure but not see)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(travel, be used to get to work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(time, be define) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(work, causes get work do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(time, be measure but not see) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(travel, be used to get to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, be used to get to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(vacation, be define by lack of work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(time, be define)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(work, causes get work do)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(time, be measure but not see)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(travel, be used to get to work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(time, be define)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(work, causes get work do)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vacation, be define by lack of work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(time, be measure but not see)