vacation: has quality spot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, absence
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.34
, summer day
Weight: 0.33
, tour
Weight: 0.33
, cruise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality spot 1.00
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality spot)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality spot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cruise, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(time travel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tour, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cruise, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality spot)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality spot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cruise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cruise, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tour, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tour, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cruise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cruise, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(time travel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(time travel, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(vacation, has quality spot)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(vacation, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vacation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality spot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cruise, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cruise, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(time travel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tour, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacation, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)