vacuum cleaner: have light on front

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vacuum
Weight: 0.76
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, noise
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings upright
Weight: 0.52
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, dryer
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have light on front 1.00
have lights 0.78
is front loading 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vacuum, have lights)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vacuum, have lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dryer, is front loading)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dryer, have lights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vacuum, have lights)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(dryer, have lights)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dryer, have lights)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dryer, is front loading)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dryer, is front loading)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, have lights)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have lights)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have lights)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum, have lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dryer, have lights)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dryer, is front loading)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have light on front)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum, have lights)