vacuum cleaner: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vacuum
Weight: 0.76
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, noise
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings upright
Weight: 0.52
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, dryer
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful to environment 0.92
harm environment 0.80
is dangerous 0.79
is unhealthy 0.79
be dangerous for health 0.78
be dangerous for human health 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(noise, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(noise, be dangerous for human health)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(noise, be harmful to environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(noise, be dangerous for human health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(noise, be dangerous for human health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(noise, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(noise, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(noise, be dangerous for human health)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(noise, be harmful to environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(noise, be dangerous for human health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(noise, be harmful to environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vacuum cleaner, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(noise, be dangerous for human health)