vacuum tube: be better for audio

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, apparatus
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.69
, inner tube
Weight: 0.37
, cooling device
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for audio 1.00
is video 0.79
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(vacuum tube, be better for audio)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, is video)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(vacuum tube, is video)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, is video)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, is video)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(vacuum tube, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, be better for audio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum tube, be better for audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, be better for audio)