vacuum tube: work in amps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, apparatus
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.69
, inner tube
Weight: 0.37
, cooling device
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in amps 1.00
be in amplifier work 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(vacuum tube, work in amps)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, be in amplifier work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, be in amplifier work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(vacuum tube, be in amplifier work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, be in amplifier work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, work in amps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(vacuum tube, work in amps)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, work in amps)