vacuum: be in condenser

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.64
, atmosphere
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.76
, outer space
Weight: 0.62
, friction
Weight: 0.32
, clean room
Weight: 0.32
, refrigeration
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in condenser 1.00
be in condenser of importance 0.91
is thermal insulator 0.78
is best thermal insulator 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(vacuum, be in condenser)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be in condenser of importance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(vacuum, be in condenser of importance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser of importance)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vacuum, be in condenser of importance)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be in condenser)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(vacuum, be in condenser)