vacuum: have headlights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.64
, atmosphere
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.76
, outer space
Weight: 0.62
, friction
Weight: 0.32
, clean room
Weight: 0.32
, refrigeration
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have headlights 1.00
have lights 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have headlights)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have lights)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have headlights)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have lights)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have lights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(vacuum, have headlights)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vacuum, have lights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(vacuum, have lights)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have lights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum, have lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have headlights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(vacuum, have headlights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have headlights)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have headlights)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have lights)