vacuum: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.64
, atmosphere
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.76
, outer space
Weight: 0.62
, friction
Weight: 0.32
, clean room
Weight: 0.32
, refrigeration
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98
is best insulator 0.98
is best thermal insulator 0.91
is thermal insulator 0.91
is good insulators 0.87
is insulators 0.84
be preferred as dielectric 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vacuum, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(vacuum, is insulator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vacuum, is best insulator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is best insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulators)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vacuum, is good insulators)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is best insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is good insulators)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vacuum, is good insulators)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vacuum, be preferred as dielectric)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(vacuum, is best insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vacuum, be preferred as dielectric)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vacuum, is best thermal insulator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is thermal insulator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be preferred as dielectric)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(vacuum, be preferred as dielectric)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vacuum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacuum, is good insulator)