van: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.69
, vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, trailer
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.56
Siblings caravan
Weight: 0.57
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.40
, truck
Weight: 0.38
, car
Weight: 0.38
, semi truck
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
is popular again 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pickup truck, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(car, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(car, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(car, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pickup truck, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pickup truck, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(van, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(van, is popular again)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(van, is popular again)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(van, is popular again)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(van, is popular again)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(van, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(van, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pickup truck, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(van, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(car, is popular)